
👍10 🙏2
Palmie said
spider_hungry said
A gentle suggestion, in case the quality isn't too poor to start...thank you in advance, these have been fantastic.
I think you forgot to add your suggestion
Ah, thank you![Permission to view this media is denied]
The following users say thank you to spider_hungry:
Darius89McCrayRiskyDaniellePattybrobigbbfan1234Crow54jplLourmel15NIPLoverbushlover12dannie69👍1964 🙏45
spider_hungry said
Palmie said
spider_hungry said
A gentle suggestion, in case the quality isn't too poor to start...thank you in advance, these have been fantastic.
I think you forgot to add your suggestion
Ah, thank you!
[Permission to view this image is denied]
[Permission to view this media is denied]
The following users say thank you to Tommy12:
PattybrojplDarius89McCrayjohwantonjames46tj99097petermassoudLourmel15NIPLoverjakub.prgJoyceKCrow54spider_hungrysuperpiehi2dannie69JmoneysDAlways looking for the best res version!
👍1964 🙏45
La Venus A Lulu 1991
posted previously with the old Topaz model,
this time round, tried the newer model and a longer clip,
while some aspects are improved, there are some advancements that needs to be made, it would help if the original quality was better though, even after searching everywhere, still cant find any decent quality of this movie...
[Permission to view this image is denied]
Original:
[Permission to view this media is denied]
Upscaled:
[Permission to view this media is denied]
The following users say thank you to Tommy12:
berziggflashlight24Redbeardskiltdavid33Darius89McCrayLourmel15NIPLoverpetermassoudSburgenfdannie69JmoneysDpnut871Always looking for the best res version!
👍7 🙏6
Tommy12 said
Tiswas said
Great work Tommy12. Shame it takes so long to produce as I have about 25 minutes of this sequence including hanging around the sports hall and bar and then to a hotel all naked.
yeah
i would also like to create longer videos, but it just takes too long...
and the issue is, two separate models are required,
one specializes in taking low res to a decent level and then the 2nd one requires a relatively decent res to make more crisp... both models take long....
but they still have flaws, but as time goes on, things get better incrementally...
If you dont mind to share, i just got topaz and 100s of hours of footage i would love to upscale, when you mention 2 models, which one do you use first?, rhea? iris? promhedus? and for the 2nd model? , also what kind of Gpu do you use? and do you enhacement the videos 2x 3x or just keep it a the same resolution, i have a decent gpu, but i am about to get the RTX 5070 ti 16gb, i just want to help
👍7 🙏6
Tommy12 said
Majka
Original (clipped):Upscaled:
I have some credits with Astra, and Topaz, and I used 85 credits to be able to use Starlight Precise 2.6 and the results are out of this world, i cant do it locally bc my gpu is not good enough, but the results are amazing
👍1964 🙏45
gatica21 said
Tommy12 said
Tiswas said
Great work Tommy12. Shame it takes so long to produce as I have about 25 minutes of this sequence including hanging around the sports hall and bar and then to a hotel all naked.
yeah
i would also like to create longer videos, but it just takes too long...
and the issue is, two separate models are required,
one specializes in taking low res to a decent level and then the 2nd one requires a relatively decent res to make more crisp... both models take long....
but they still have flaws, but as time goes on, things get better incrementally...
If you dont mind to share, i just got topaz and 100s of hours of footage i would love to upscale, when you mention 2 models, which one do you use first?, rhea? iris? promhedus? and for the 2nd model? , also what kind of Gpu do you use? and do you enhacement the videos 2x 3x or just keep it a the same resolution, i have a decent gpu, but i am about to get the RTX 5070 ti 16gb, i just want to help
for the very low res vids, (mostly the older nude-in-public vids)
i use starlight mini first
then starlight precise as a second passthrough
the problem that i see though (precise 2.5) is that if the model isnt close enough to the camera and the video quality is extremely poor, then the model changes her face too much. there are many videos that i wanted to upload but the faces were changed far too much so then i abandoned it.
both models take very long (mini takes a bit longer than precise - around 20% longer), but i find that starlight mini is great at bringing a very poor quality vid up to a decent level, but is very soft, but then i use precise which is much better at sharpening the video, if the original vid has a decent res already, then i just stick to precise, (also saves a lot of processing time)
what i also do to speed up the processing time is to reduce the videos fps to 24
because some are 30 or even 60 fps, before using starlight mini or precise)
i do have a decent gpu (RTX 4090) but it still takes long..
i have tried rhea XL after using the starlight models to increase the res, to varying degrees of success, and they dont take much time compared to the starlight models...
your 5070Ti should be fine because the VRAM usage with these models seems to be all over the place, it mostly hovers around 14GB, but then spikes to 17GB occasionally but also goes the other way down to 5GB...but what is constant is, the gpu is at 100% usage the whole way through.
The following users say thank you to Tommy12:
gatica21dannie69JmoneysDAlways looking for the best res version!

136
Dormouse, didier, Arti27, Pattybro, Sailor, glab, [email protected], empty, oon_enf_euf_dare, Tiscaleo2, armitage, Frankieboi, twangbong, xpj100, naxobidal, pokolayo, Crow54, Voyeur77, demexin, Alan.Darski
26
1 Guest(s)